Short answer: Complicated but not adversarial. Thomas Friedman is a Jewish American journalist with a decades-long personal and professional bond to Israel who has consistently affirmed the country's right to exist, while also being one of the sharpest mainstream American critics of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government specifically. He has not called for boycotting Israel and continues to push for a two-state solution and a strong US-Israel relationship. As of August 2026, that remains the most accurate way to describe his position.
What Thomas Friedman has actually said and done
1979 to the mid-1980s: Friedman built his early career reporting from the region, serving as United Press International's Beirut correspondent starting in 1979 and later as the New York Times' Jerusalem bureau chief. That reporting became the basis of his 1989 book "From Beirut to Jerusalem" and earned him Pulitzer Prizes for international reporting, giving him a personal, decades-deep tie to Israel that critics on both sides of the debate acknowledge, according to Wikipedia's summary of his published account.
March 24, 2024: At a Haaretz-UCLA conference titled "Israel After October 7," Friedman told Haaretz editor-in-chief Aluf Benn that Netanyahu's coalition was "the worst government Israel has ever had" and that Netanyahu "will go down in history as the worst leader in Jewish history, not just in Israeli history," as reported by Haaretz.
May 13, 2024: In a New York Times column syndicated by The Herald, Friedman declined to label the pro-Palestinian campus protests "antisemitic" as a category, but wrote that slogans calling to "liberate Palestine" effectively deny Israel's right to exist. In the same piece he faulted Hamas for launching the October 7 attack without regard for Gazan civilians, criticized Israel's civilian death toll in Gaza, and restated his support for a two-state solution.
June 2025: On PBS's Washington Week, Friedman discussed what he described as Netanyahu's misunderstanding of American Jewish politics, part of a running argument that Netanyahu's approach was straining rather than strengthening US-Israel ties and American Jewish support for Israel, according to PBS.
February 17, 2026: Friedman published a New York Times column arguing that Netanyahu was playing Trump and American Jewish leaders for fools again, and that Netanyahu was manipulating President Trump and American Jewish leaders by focusing them on the Iranian threat while pursuing West Bank annexation and open-ended control of Gaza. Friedman called that approach reckless for Israel's democracy, demographics, and standing, including among young American voters, per the Washington Free Beacon's report on the column. Friedman shared the piece on X that week.
The fuller picture
Thomas L. Friedman (born 1953 in Minneapolis) is a Jewish American journalist and longtime New York Times foreign-affairs columnist. He grew up in a Jewish family, became fascinated with Israel after a teenage visit shortly after the 1967 Six-Day War, and built his early career there. That biography gives him a personal foundation that is hard to dispute even among readers who reject his conclusions.
His public position is not a simple "for" or "against." He has never called for boycotting Israel, has consistently defended its right to exist, has criticized rhetoric he sees as denying that right, and has pushed for continued close US-Israel ties. At the same time, he has become one of the most persistent mainstream American critics of the Netanyahu government specifically, arguing across 2024, 2025, and into 2026 that its conduct of the Gaza war, lack of postwar planning, and moves toward West Bank annexation damage Israel's democracy, its standing abroad, and the safety of Jews worldwide. Israeli and pro-Israel outlets, including the Jerusalem Post, JNS, and the American Jewish Committee, have pushed back on individual columns as overstating Israel's isolation, while pro-Palestinian commentators, including In These Times, have separately criticized him from the opposite direction as still too pro-Israel. That crossfire from both sides is itself evidence that Friedman occupies a heavily contested middle position rather than a simple stance.
No public record was found of Friedman making personal donations to Israeli causes, appearing at pro-Israel advocacy events, or taking a position on any boycott campaign. His engagement with Israel runs almost entirely through journalism and commentary, not activism or philanthropy.
The bottom line
Thomas Friedman supports Israel's existence and a strong US-Israel relationship, and he rejects rhetoric that denies Israel's right to exist. But he is also a consistent, high-profile critic of the Netanyahu government's specific policies on Gaza, the West Bank, and annexation, which he argues damage Israel over the long run. He is not a boycotter and is not "against Israel," but he is also not an uncritical supporter of current Israeli government policy.
Wear where you stand
Whatever your read on any individual columnist, plenty of people want a plain, unambiguous way to show where they stand on Israel itself. Our I Stand With Israel collection was made for exactly that: simple, wearable pieces that say the quiet part out loud, no commentary required.
Related
Does Caroline Glick Support Israel?
Does Peter Beinart Support Israel?
Does Christiane Amanpour Support Israel?
Last updated August 2026. We update these profiles as the record changes.
